Archive for March, 2010

Palm Pre – an update

23.03.2010 – Stephen Holmes

A little while ago I gave my opinion on the Palm Pre, well Wired have now whacked up an article with their list of suggestions to help the ailing phone. I think their suggestion of becoming a ‘MiFi killer’ is a great one and certainly a feature that I knew absolutely nothing about. As with their idea of providing first class customer service (I really believe it’s a great way for any company to really stand out from their competitors and create great word-of-mouth and goodwill).

But, these still don’t affect the hardware. And, after my girlfriend had her iPhone lifted, she decided to give it a go rather than forking out for a new iPhone straight away.

Upshot; the GUI is ok but the keyboard is horrible. Horrible to look at, horrible to touch and bloody horrible to actually use (too small and feels super cheap). Having had an iPhone you just assume that all other smart phones must be roughly the same in terms of top end quality – but she’s now seriously weighing up the option of using the Pre or having to splash the cash for a new (or more likely second hand) iPhone.

So whilst Wired’s suggestions will certainly help with the marketing and positioning of the Palm Pre, there are some underlying hardware issues that need sorting out before any significant increase in sales. And that’s an area that Apple excels at, creating something that looks and feels beautiful.

Confused.com – I certainly am

02.03.2010 – Stephen Holmes

Recently, Confused.com changed the agencies that they use for both their media buying & planning and their creative (disclosure: one of our clients – MNC – used to be their media agency).

The creative and strategy recently seems to have changed too, nothing too unusual about that, to be expected really.

But, I’ve just seen one of their new TV commercials (“Jeans” – below) and I just don’t get it.

Now, don’t get me wrong, the concept I do get – use Confused.com and save a load of money.

It’s the item and the person that seem a little bit confused. If it’s the man wishfully looking at the thing he could have bought with the money saved, it should be something for himself, or if it’s for the ‘better-half’ surely it should be something that he would have an interest in her wearing, say… lingerie, or a lovely dress. Jeans however just seems a bit mundane.

I don’t know any bloke that’s thought, “I bet she’ll look great in a pair of jeans”.

A gorgeous dress, yes.

A pair of jeans, no.

She might like a pair of jeans, but she’s not the one being kept awake at night wishing she’d used Confused.com to save the money to buy them. And as they’re trying to say that everyone will (could) save (over) £150, they’re a very expensive pair of jeans. A few shopping bags might have been better, as if she’d been on a shopping spree with the money she’d saved – that would be if she was the one lying in bed awake at night thinking about the money she could have saved if only she’d been smart enough to use the site.

But she’s not.

It’s her fella thinking of jeans she might like.

The advert is then backed up by print (nothing wrong with that) but sadly the billboards are, errr, what shall we say, “somewhat less than exciting?”

As you can see, it doesn’t exactly get the pulse racing does it?

Will it work? I suspect not particularly.

Creatively, are they lagging behind the pack? Yep.

They are confused and I certainly am.


// Image: photo of the Confused.com print advert lovingly ‘nicked’ from Mike Cheshire’s blog, I am Mix